The Out-Group Homogeneity Effect Across Development: A Cross-Cultural Investigation
The Out-Group Homogeneity Effect Across Development: A Cross-Cultural InvestigationThe present studies investigated the out-group homogeneity effect in 5- and 8-year-old Israeli and German children (n = 150) and adults (n = 96). Participants were asked to infer whether a given property (either biological or psychological) was true of an entire group—either the participants’ in-group (“Jews” or “Germans”) or their out-group (“Arabs” or “Turks”). To that end, participants had to select either a homogenous or a heterogeneous sample of group members. It was found that across ages and countries, participants selected heterogeneous samples less often when inferring the biological properties of out-compared to in-group members. No effect was found regarding psychological properties. These findings have important implications for our understanding of the origins of intergroup bias.https://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/de/development/publications_department/articlereference-2018-05-08-1503781058https://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/@@site-logo/university-of-goettingen-logo.svg
R. Shilo, A. Weinsdörfer, H. Rakoczy and G. Diesendruck
The Out-Group Homogeneity Effect Across Development: A Cross-Cultural Investigation
Child Development
The present studies investigated the out-group homogeneity effect in 5- and 8-year-old Israeli and German
children (n = 150) and adults (n = 96). Participants were asked to infer whether a given property (either biological or psychological) was true of an entire group—either the participants’ in-group (“Jews” or “Germans”)
or their out-group (“Arabs” or “Turks”). To that end, participants had to select either a homogenous or a
heterogeneous sample of group members. It was found that across ages and countries, participants selected
heterogeneous samples less often when inferring the biological properties of out-compared to in-group members. No effect was found regarding psychological properties. These findings have important implications for
our understanding of the origins of intergroup bias.