The development of selective trust: Prospects for a dual-process account
The development of selective trust: Prospects for a dual-process account—Young children learn selectively from reliable rather than unreliable models. Yet the question of what cognitive processes this early selectivity builds on remains unanswered. One line of research suggests that rational trait reasoning might be the basis of young children’s selective trust, while others suggest less sophisticated processes. In this article, we provide an overview of the development of selective trust and introduce a new theoretical framework to explain the seemingly divergent findings. Young children’s selective trust can best be explained by assuming two kinds of underlying cognitive processes: one fast, implicit, and heuristic process that provides default judgments, and one systematic, slow, and effortful process that intervenes under specific circumstances. We discuss findings in light of this framework and propose testable predictions for research.https://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/de/development/publications_department/articlereference-2017-11-07-6831600056https://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/@@site-logo/university-of-goettingen-logo.svg
J Hermes, T Behne and H Rakoczy
The development of selective trust: Prospects for a dual-process account
Child Development Perspectives
—Young children learn selectively from reliable
rather than unreliable models. Yet the question of what
cognitive processes this early selectivity builds on remains
unanswered. One line of research suggests that rational
trait reasoning might be the basis of young children’s
selective trust, while others suggest less sophisticated processes. In this article, we provide an overview of the development of selective trust and introduce a new theoretical
framework to explain the seemingly divergent findings.
Young children’s selective trust can best be explained by
assuming two kinds of underlying cognitive processes: one
fast, implicit, and heuristic process that provides default
judgments, and one systematic, slow, and effortful process
that intervenes under specific circumstances. We discuss
findings in light of this framework and propose testable
predictions for research.