Publikationen
2022
- Engelmann, N. & Waldmann, M. (2022). How causal structure, causal strength, and foreseeability affect moral judgments. Cognition, 226, 105167.
- Engelmann, N. & Waldmann, M. (2022). How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures. Cognition, 218, 104910.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2022). The role of mechanism knowledge in singular causation judgments. Cognition, 218, 104924.
2021
- Engelmann, N. & Waldmann, M. (2021). A causal proximity effect in moral judgment. (). : .
- Krueger, J., Hahn, U., Ellerbrock, D., Gächter, S., Hertwig, R., Kornhauser, L., ... Waldmann, M. (2021). Normative implications of deliberate ignorance. In R. Hertwig & C. Engel, (pp. 242-271). : MIT Press.
- Skovgaard-Olsen, N., Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). Conditionals and the hierarchy of causal queries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). The interplay between covariation, temporal, and mechanism information in singular causation judgments.
- Stephan, S., Plac\`\i, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). Evaluating General versus Singular Causal Prevention.
- Stephan, S., Tentori, K., Pighin, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). Interpolating causal mechanisms: The paradox of knowing more. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
- Waldmann, M. (2021). The rationality of everyday causal cognition. In M. Knauff & W. Spohn, The handbook of rationality. (pp. 439-448). None: MIT Press.
2020
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2020). Causal scope and causal strength: The number of potential effects of a cause influences causal strength estimates. --. (pp. 3426 - 3432). None: Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2020). On causal claims, contingencies, and inference: How causal terminology affects what we think about the strength of causal links. (pp. 3419 - 3425). : Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Stephan, S., Mayrhofer, R. & Waldmann, M. (2020). Time and Singular Causation—A Computational Model. Cognitive Science, 44(7), e12871.
2019
2018
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2018). Preemption in singular causation judgments: A computational model. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10, 242-257.
- Stephan, S., Mayrhofer, R. & Waldmann, M. (2018). Assessing singular causation: The role of causal latencies. In T.T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), (pp. 1080-1085). : Cognitive Science Society.
2017
- Beller, S., Bender, A. & Waldmann, M. (2017). Editorial: Diversity and Universality in Causal Cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1767. https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01767.
- Rehder, B. & Waldmann, M. (2017). Failures of explaining away and screening off in described versus experienced causal learning scenarios. Memory & Cognition, 45(2), 245-260. https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0662-3, ISSN: 0090-502X.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2017). Preemption in Singular Causation Judgments: A Computational Model. In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.), (). : Cognitive Science Society . (Computational Modeling: Higher Level Cognition Award of the Cognitive Science Society).
- Waldmann, M. (2017). The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning.
- Waldmann, M. (2017). Kategorisierung und Wissenserwerb (PSYNDEXshort). (Kategorisierung und Wissenserwerb (PSYNDEXshort), pp. 357-399). : Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-53897-1.
- Waldmann, M., Wiegmann, A. & Nagel, J. (2017). Causal models mediate moral inferences. In J.-F. Bonnefort & B. Trémolière (Eds.), (pp. 37-55). : Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
2016
- Dwyer, D. & Waldmann, M. (2016). Beyond the Information (Not) Given: Representations of Stimulus Absence in Rats (Rattus norvegicus). Comparative Psychologie, 130(3), 192-204. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039733.
- Mayrhofer, R. & Waldmann, M. (2016). Sufficiency and necessity assumptions in causal structure induction. Cognitive Science, 40(8), 2137-2150. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12318, ISSN: 0364-0213.
- Nagel, J. & Waldmann, M. (2016). On having very long arms: How the availability of technological means affects moral cognition. Thinking & Reasoning, 22(2), 184-208. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1114023, ISSN: 1354-6783.
- Powell, D., Cheng, P. & Waldmann, M. (2016). How should autonomous vehicles behave in moral dilemmas? Human judgments reflect abstract moral principles.
- Samland, J., Josephs, M., Waldmann, M. & Rakoczy, H. (2016). The role of prescriptive norms and knowledge in childrenʼs and adultsʼ causal selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(2), 125-130. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000138, ISSN: 0096-3445.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2016). Answering Causal Queries about Singular Cases. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J.C. Trueswell (Eds.), (pp. 2795-2801). : Cognitive Science Society.
- Waldmann, M. R. & Mayrhofer, R. (2016). Hybrid causal representations. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. (pp. 85-127). New York: Academic Press. ISBN: 978-0-12-804790-3.
- Wiegmann, A., Samland, J. & Waldmann, M. (2016). Lying despite telling the truth. Cognition, 150, 37-42.