Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional actions
Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional actionsWhen dogs interact with humans, they often show appropriate reactions to human intentional action. But it is unclear from these everyday observations whether the dogs simply respond to the action outcomes or whether they are able to discriminate between diferent categories of actions. Are dogs able to distinguish intentional human actions from unintentional ones, even when the action outcomes are the same? We tested dogs’ ability to discriminate these action categories by adapting the so-called “Unwilling vs. Unable” paradigm. This paradigm compares subjects’ reactions to intentional and unintentional human behaviour. All dogs received three conditions: In the unwillingcondition, an experimenter intentionally withheld a reward from them. In the two unable-conditions, she unintentionally withheld the reward, either because she was clumsy or because she was physically prevented from giving the reward to the dog. Dogs clearly distinguished in their spontaneous behaviour between unwilling- and unable-conditions. This indicates that dogs indeed distinguish intentional actions from unintentional behaviour. We critically discuss our fndings with regard to dogs’ understanding of human intentional action.https://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/de/development/publications_department/articlereference-2021-09-22-7989930830https://www.psych.uni-goettingen.de/@@site-logo/university-of-goettingen-logo.svg
B Schünemann, J Keller, H Rakoczy, T Behne and J Bräuer
Dogs distinguish human intentional and unintentional actions
Scientific Reports
When dogs interact with humans, they often show appropriate reactions to human intentional
action. But it is unclear from these everyday observations whether the dogs simply respond to the
action outcomes or whether they are able to discriminate between diferent categories of actions.
Are dogs able to distinguish intentional human actions from unintentional ones, even when the
action outcomes are the same? We tested dogs’ ability to discriminate these action categories by
adapting the so-called “Unwilling vs. Unable” paradigm. This paradigm compares subjects’ reactions
to intentional and unintentional human behaviour. All dogs received three conditions: In the unwillingcondition, an experimenter intentionally withheld a reward from them. In the two unable-conditions,
she unintentionally withheld the reward, either because she was clumsy or because she was physically
prevented from giving the reward to the dog. Dogs clearly distinguished in their spontaneous
behaviour between unwilling- and unable-conditions. This indicates that dogs indeed distinguish
intentional actions from unintentional behaviour. We critically discuss our fndings with regard to
dogs’ understanding of human intentional action.