Publikationen
2022
- Engelmann, N. & Waldmann, M. (2022). How causal structure, causal strength, and foreseeability affect moral judgments. Cognition, 226, 105167.
- Engelmann, N. & Waldmann, M. (2022). How to weigh lives. A computational model of moral judgment in multiple-outcome structures. Cognition, 218, 104910.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2022). The role of mechanism knowledge in singular causation judgments. Cognition, 218, 104924.
2021
- Engelmann, N. & Waldmann, M. (2021). A causal proximity effect in moral judgment. (). : .
- Krueger, J., Hahn, U., Ellerbrock, D., Gächter, S., Hertwig, R., Kornhauser, L., ... Waldmann, M. (2021). Normative implications of deliberate ignorance. In R. Hertwig & C. Engel, (pp. 242-271). : MIT Press.
- Skovgaard-Olsen, N., Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). Conditionals and the hierarchy of causal queries. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). The interplay between covariation, temporal, and mechanism information in singular causation judgments.
- Stephan, S., Plac\`\i, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). Evaluating General versus Singular Causal Prevention.
- Stephan, S., Tentori, K., Pighin, S. & Waldmann, M. (2021). Interpolating causal mechanisms: The paradox of knowing more. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.
- Waldmann, M. (2021). The rationality of everyday causal cognition. In M. Knauff & W. Spohn, The handbook of rationality. (pp. 439-448). None: MIT Press.
2020
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2020). Causal scope and causal strength: The number of potential effects of a cause influences causal strength estimates. --. (pp. 3426 - 3432). None: Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M. (2020). On causal claims, contingencies, and inference: How causal terminology affects what we think about the strength of causal links. (pp. 3419 - 3425). : Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Stephan, S., Mayrhofer, R. & Waldmann, M. (2020). Time and Singular Causation—A Computational Model. Cognitive Science, 44(7), e12871.
2019
2018
-
Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M.
(2018).
Preemption in singular causation judgments: A computational model.
Topics in Cognitive Science,
10,
242-257.
- Stephan, S., Mayrhofer, R. & Waldmann, M. (2018). Assessing singular causation: The role of causal latencies. In T.T. Rogers, M. Rau, X. Zhu, & C. W. Kalish (Eds.), (pp. 1080-1085). : Cognitive Science Society.
2017
-
Beller, S., Bender, A. & Waldmann, M.
(2017).
Editorial: Diversity and Universality in Causal Cognition.
Frontiers in Psychology,
8,
1767.
https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01767.
-
Rehder, B. & Waldmann, M.
(2017).
Failures of explaining away and screening off in described versus experienced causal learning scenarios.
Memory & Cognition,
45(2),
245-260.
https://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0662-3, ISSN: 0090-502X.
-
Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M.
(2017).
Preemption in Singular Causation Judgments: A Computational Model.
In G. Gunzelmann, A. Howes, T. Tenbrink, & E. Davelaar (Eds.),
(). : Cognitive Science Society . (Computational Modeling: Higher Level Cognition Award of the Cognitive Science Society).
- Waldmann, M. (2017). The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning.
- Waldmann, M. (2017). Kategorisierung und Wissenserwerb (PSYNDEXshort). (Kategorisierung und Wissenserwerb (PSYNDEXshort), pp. 357-399). : Springer. ISBN: 978-3-642-53897-1.
-
Waldmann, M., Wiegmann, A. & Nagel, J.
(2017).
Causal models mediate moral inferences.
In J.-F. Bonnefort & B. Trémolière (Eds.),
(pp. 37-55). : Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
2016
-
Dwyer, D. & Waldmann, M.
(2016).
Beyond the Information (Not) Given: Representations of Stimulus Absence in Rats (Rattus norvegicus).
Comparative Psychologie,
130(3),
192-204.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0039733.
-
Mayrhofer, R. & Waldmann, M.
(2016).
Sufficiency and necessity assumptions in causal structure induction.
Cognitive Science,
40(8),
2137-2150.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12318, ISSN: 0364-0213.
-
Nagel, J. & Waldmann, M.
(2016).
On having very long arms: How the availability of technological means affects moral cognition.
Thinking & Reasoning,
22(2),
184-208.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2015.1114023, ISSN: 1354-6783.
-
Powell, D., Cheng, P. & Waldmann, M.
(2016).
How should autonomous vehicles behave in moral dilemmas? Human judgments reflect abstract moral principles.
-
Samland, J., Josephs, M., Waldmann, M. & Rakoczy, H.
(2016).
The role of prescriptive norms and knowledge in childrenʼs and adultsʼ causal selection.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,
145(2),
125-130.
https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000138, ISSN: 0096-3445.
-
Stephan, S. & Waldmann, M.
(2016).
Answering Causal Queries about Singular Cases.
In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J.C. Trueswell (Eds.),
(pp. 2795-2801). : Cognitive Science Society.
-
Waldmann, M. R. & Mayrhofer, R.
(2016).
Hybrid causal representations.
In B. Ross (Ed.),
The Psychology of Learning and Motivation.
(pp. 85-127). New York: Academic Press.
ISBN: 978-0-12-804790-3.
-
Wiegmann, A., Samland, J. & Waldmann, M.
(2016).
Lying despite telling the truth.
Cognition,
150,
37-42.